[Supras] Standalones

[Michael Green]

 I have to second Rocky's Translator Pro recommendation. This unit offers a great deal of capabilities for a very reasonable price. The support offered on Full Throttle Tech is outstanding and the knowledgeable people will answer any questions you have.  Rocky; what T-Pro update are you running? I installed version 4.80 prior to doing any tuning. I have never had an issue with fuel cut, regardless of RPM and currently running 17.5 PSI. I remember reading something about issues with the 4.40 version that comes with the T-Pro.
 Mike



> Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 16:42:31 -0700> From: supr91tt at yahoo.com> To: sprigmo1 at yahoo.com; supras at supras.com> Subject: Re: [Supras] Standalones> > Malik, any particular reason you are leaning towards a more expensive (likely more complicated) stand alone over the MAFT-Pro piggy back? I'm not a paid supporter, in fact I'm only just now wading in on the MAFT-Pro in speed density mode and learning about engine control while coming up to speed. Currently after 2 weeks (OK I'm a little little slow) I'm working on out-of-the-box conservative tune on basically stock turbo setup I've started tweaking the boost control settings and trying to figure out why the heck am I hitting fuel cut at any less than 4000 rpm ~ 12 psi boost but above that no problems and maintaining ~ 11.9 AFR?? > I'm pretty sure it has something to do with an as yet understood setting but at 10 psi boost I had no issues and noticeably improved performance and engine stability immediately after basic install and setup. I don't know what the current cost of a stand alone system is but I paid ~ $700 for the speed density complete kit back in November (OK, I'm a little slow with upgrades). Personally I'm impressed so far after only 2 weeks of my rather slow implementation and further tuning of what appears to be a relatively inexpensive, highly tunable engine control (boost, AFR, & timing if I choose) option.> > FWIW from a MAFT-Pro newbie - but enjoying relatively inexpensive control/tuning (if becomes expensive probably from not conservative adjustments)> Rockey 91T> > > ----- Original Message ----> From: sprigmo1 <sprigmo1 at yahoo.com>> To: car club <supras at supras.com>> Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 3:53:18 PM> Subject: [Supras] Standalones> > Is anyone on the list using an Electromotive TEC.> Been doing some research and it seems like a great> unit. Expensive but it seems to be worth a look!> Malik> On another note. My build is progressing well, just> slow. Just got my ATI Dampner back. For anyone going> that route, you have to get your crank bolt machined> down to fit inside the ATI.> My head is still at the shop but the coated pistons> are in and the bottom half is all together. Just> gotta get my head back on. I have the HKS adj cam> gears but I don't plan on using them so I want to get> some stock ones. Anyone got some layin around let me> know. I also have a Lexus afm w/electronics I'm> getting rid of.> > Malik> It Ain't Eazy Being Me!!!!> 92Trbo Supra 367whp> 92 Supra Turbo Targa, > Blitz peek hold device, Apexi Super AFC, Apexi AVC-R, HKS > Timing Gears,, K&N FIPKE, catch can modification, > Apexi N1 Exhaust, Random Technology High flow > CAT, AEM UEGO Wideband 02 Unit, CSF > Aluminum 52mm Race radiator, Walbro > Racing Fuel Pump, Aeromotive AFPR, > Horsepower Freaks 700hp custom Supra > intercooler and hardpipes, Greddy bov, HKS > 3000Pipe > > > > > > > _______________________________________________> Supras mailing list> Supras at supras.com> http://supras.com/mailman/listinfo/supras_supras.com> > > > > _______________________________________________> Supras mailing list> Supras at supras.com> http://supras.com/mailman/listinfo/supras_supras.com