[Supras] Dry Cell Batteries for MK3

[Walker, Brian (Rich. Dist)]

Hopefully it'll do fine, just wondering the reason for offering two
models. VA heat, bahhh. It's only 99 today. I'll check the temp of my
battery at the next event. Don't recall if getting hot compared to other
pieces but I could be wrong. 
I still have a full interior but racing buckets shed a little weight off
that 75 lb. drivers seat. The brackets probably weigh as much as the new
seats but I can't weld Al. so they'll stay for now. I've looked for an
FG hood but no luck, maybe a C/F one eventually if the price is right
(I'd bet it would save close to 30 lbs.)
 
Btw, I'll be at Summit in Oct., you going anytime soon?
Brian

________________________________

From: khalida1 at aol.com [mailto:khalida1 at aol.com] 
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2007 2:39 PM
To: Walker, Brian (Rich. Dist)
Cc: Supras at supras.com
Subject: Re: [Supras] Dry Cell Batteries for MK3



Well, on odysseybatteries.com it says it's is for "General use engine
start", so I guess I am going to find out.  I did see one that looked
very similar to the PC680 used in a MKIV last year at Summit Point and
it had the aluminum box.  I'll find out, soon enough, how its going to
do, especially during the Virginia summer heat where I am at.

     And on the remaining 3600 lbs, thanks for reminding me P) , I've
already removed rear seats, spare tire, stereo, speakers, and have
aluminum for wheels, flywheel and drive shaft.

     I hope one day to get a fiberglass hood (carbon fiber is too much
$), maybe a fiberglass/aluminum targa top.

/Khalid, 90T

  -----Original Message-----
From: Walker, Brian (Rich. Dist) 
To: khalida1 at aol.com; supras at supras.com
Sent: Fri, 8 Jun 2007 1:57 pm
Subject: Re: [Supras] Dry Cell Batteries for MK3


Is the 680 rated for automotive use? (I wasn't sure if it was intended
for motorcycle/ATV where it would be placed in more open air and maybe
the MJ version is meant for auto use under the hood)
Yeah, the Braille was expensive so if it fails I'll probably be
Flintstoning the car to start it :) It does have a peak charge of ~900A
(only 15 AH) which is probably why it costs that much. They also have
bigger versions for other apps. This model doesn't have a metal jack
either but has carbon shielding that may be heat tolerant enough. Of
course using a smaller size in general allows better cooling due to the
increased clearance. I thought the 680 was more than $80, that's not bad
for a battery less than half stock weight (my stock size was 37lbs.)
Brian 
-Now to do something with the other 3600 pounds of this beast :) 
Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2007 11:03:20 -0400 
From: khalida1 at aol.com 
Subject: Re: [Supras] Dry Cell Batteries for MK3 
To: jjobe2 at supratech.org 
Cc: Supras at supras.com 
Message-ID: <8C977F5499DC295-118-E655 at FWM-M07.sysops.aol.com> 
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" 
Ok.? Thanks for everyone who sent their feedback. 
I went ahead and got the PC680T and the aluminum box that holds it
down.? It turns out if you decide to place a drycell battery under the
hood then it must be contained in a solid box to prevent it from
expanding from the heat, otherwise the expansion?would cause it to
fail.? There is a version which comes with its won't box, they call
metal jacket,?which is the PC680MJ, MJ (for metal jacket).
???? I realize the PC925 has more CCA and more charge capacity (25AH),
but it also weighs 25lbs or so, and I wanted to benefit from a light
weight battery 15 lbs for PC680.? Definetly the?Braille is the lightest
drycell battery around, and I almost went for it, but it does cost a lot
more (~$170 for Braille and ~$82 for PC680).
Thanks again for all that replied. 
/Khalid, 90T 



________________________________

AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free
from AOL at AOL.com <http://www.aol.com?ncid=AOLAOF00020000000437> .