[Supras] Tire recomendation
berniek at technicaldevelop.com
berniek at technicaldevelop.com
Sat Dec 1 23:18:43 CST 2007
Jeff:
Thanks for the response. I should have stated that the tires on the
car are RE750's. Interestingly the RE750's are not rated that much
differently than the RE050A's:
RE050A: Cornering: 9.1. Dry traction: 9.2. Steering response: 9.1.
RE750: Cornering: 8.6. Dry traction: 8.9. Steering response: 8.7.
Maybe the ratings are not really indicative of how the tires feel
and behave in practice. Tonight before writing, I took my favorite
drive in the coldest weather we have had here in the Northeast (maybe
28F to 30F earlier tonight). In September weather when I first got the
car running with the refreshed engine it was not that much different,
though, although WOT bursts were kept to a minimum until I had about 400
miles on the engine (just about now).
Any ideas about the influence of temperature would be appreciated.
Bernie
Jeff Mohler wrote:
> Bernie:
>
> I swear by these:
> http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tires.jsp?tireMake=Bridgestone&tireModel=Potenza+RE050A
> <http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tires.jsp?tireMake=Bridgestone&tireModel=Potenza+RE050A>
>
>
> I really overall love them.
>
>
>
> On Dec 1, 2007 8:36 PM, berniek at technicaldevelop.com
> <mailto:berniek at technicaldevelop.com> < berniek at technicaldevelop.com
> <mailto:berniek at technicaldevelop.com>> wrote:
>
> Joe:
>
>
> Thanks for the reply. In part I went for the Bridgestones
> (RE750's)
> because of what appeared to be a decent tradeoff between tread
> life and
> traction, based upon information from the Tire Rack website and a call
> to them. Interestingly, the person I spoke to tried to sell me
> cheaper
> tires at first (some Far Eastern brand I never heard of). A local
> dealer here with a good reputation is a Tire Rack affiliate, and
> charges
> $35 each for all aspects of installation and old tire disposal.
>
>
> At this point, I'd be nuts to throw away almost $500 (two tires,
> counting shipping) but at some point replacement will be necessary.
> Models will probably change in the couple of years the present tires
> will last, but any idea of the Goodyear model you had would be
> appreciated. Tire Rack just expanded their selection of 275/40/17
> tires, and one or two Goodyears are among the offerings.
>
>
> Take care.
>
>
> Bernie
>
>
> joe at wilmcd.com <mailto:joe at wilmcd.com> wrote:
> > Bernie, I made 304RWHP on a stock CT-26 so you are over that
> with the mods
> > you have. You are probably in the high 300's at the crank if I
> was to
> > guess.
> >
> > I used to have some Goodyear's that were great although fairly
> expensive.
> > I now have Yokohama's that aren't bad but they aren't quite as
> sticky as I
> > would like. I'm sure the brand doesn't matter as much as the
> model though.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >> Need some recommendations regarding rear tires which will last
> for a
> >> while, yet will have enough traction for a mildly modified
> engine which
> >> feels a let better than stock: 550cc, Lex, 15-17 PSI boost, 57
> trim
> >> CT26, 3" turbo back exhaust, MHG and the customary mods which
> go with
> >> it. Right now I have Bridgestone 275/40/ZR17's on the rear,
> bought new
> >> (the car is a '91 but has '98 17" MkIV wheels). First gear is
> useless
> >> at WOT with reasonable street tires, which is expected, unless
> I want to
> >> wind up in the weeds or against a guard rail. But it sometimes
> starts
> >> to wheel hop at about 4500 RPM in second as well. Yeah, I
> could add
> >> traction bars to stop wheel hop, but there would still be the
> need to
> >> gain traction.
> >>
> >>
> >> There are some 1000 HP MkIV videos on YouTube which do not gain
> traction
> >> at WOT until 70 MPH, but I'm probably not much over 300 HP at the
> >> flywheel, yet 4500 RPM in second gear is about 50 MPH, as a guess.
> >>
> >>
> >> Last time I looked at tires for a compromise between tread life
> and
> >> traction was decades ago in my GTO and Firebird days. Although
> I do not
> >> anticipate driving in snow (or rain for that matter), I might
> >> occasionally get caught in something unexpected. So slicks are
> out.
> >> This car was intended to be a (30% of the time) daily driver.
> >>
> >>
> >> Comments would be appreciated.
> >>
> >>
> >> BernieK
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Supras mailing list
> >> Supras at supras.com <mailto:Supras at supras.com>
> >> http://supras.com/mailman/listinfo/supras_supras.com
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Supras mailing list
> Supras at supras.com <mailto:Supras at supras.com>
> http://supras.com/mailman/listinfo/supras_supras.com
>
>
More information about the Supras
mailing list