[Supras] Supras Digest, Vol 35, Issue 2
t72pwrd
nholden1 at woh.rr.com
Tue Oct 3 16:50:28 CDT 2006
I can do one for $55 shipped if you're in the continental US.
-Nick
----- Original Message -----
From: "john peerzada" <longjohn_69_3 at hotmail.com>
To: <supras at supras.com>
Sent: Tuesday, October 03, 2006 12:09 PM
Subject: Re: [Supras] Supras Digest, Vol 35, Issue 2
> lol.......any one hook a supra bratha up with a (AFM)
> air flow meter...........will pay
>
>>From: supras-request at supras.com
>>Reply-To: supras at supras.com
>>To: supras at supras.com
>>Subject: Supras Digest, Vol 35, Issue 2
>>Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2006 07:19:41 -0500
>>
>>Send Supras mailing list submissions to
>> supras at supras.com
>>
>>To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>> http://supras.com/mailman/listinfo/supras_supras.com
>>or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>> supras-request at supras.com
>>
>>You can reach the person managing the list at
>> supras-owner at supras.com
>>
>>When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>>than "Re: Contents of Supras digest..."
>>
>>
>>Today's Topics:
>>
>> 1. Progressive PPS years?? (Brian Walker)
>> 2. Re: Progressive PPS years?? (Dave Koos)
>> 3. Re: Progressive PPS years?? (Brian Walker)
>> 4. Power stearing pump (Jeff)
>> 5. Re: needing parts to go turbo (Jim Thomann)
>> 6. Re: needing parts to go turbo (Jeff Mohler)
>> 7. cygnusx1 tsrm (suprra girl)
>> 8. Re: Power stearing pump (Dave Koos)
>> 9. Re: Progressive PPS years?? (Dave Koos)
>> 10. Re: Progressive PPS years?? (Rockey Fox)
>>
>>
>>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>Message: 1
>>Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 14:13:43 -0400
>>From: "Brian Walker" <Brian.Walker at timmons.com>
>>Subject: [Supras] Progressive PPS years??
>>To: "supras list" <supras at supras.com>
>>Message-ID:
>> <7FC96997A9B03C46BDCCC4A071D16AF603BE8C8C at webmail.timmons.com>
>>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>>
>>I was looking up the P/N's for lines of the PS system (Thanks Mike for
>>the EPC being updated) and the P/N for the PS pressure hose lists
>>several variations. On listing is for 89-92 w/ progressive steering. Is
>>this something the 86-88 did not include? I had always assumed it did
>>but have never had to mess with the PS system (was planning to replacing
>>the old lines)
>>
>>
>>
>>Thanks,
>>
>>Brian W-88T
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>------------------------------
>>
>>Message: 2
>>Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 11:45:49 -0700
>>From: "Dave Koos" <dave at azsupras.com>
>>Subject: Re: [Supras] Progressive PPS years??
>>To: "Brian Walker" <Brian.Walker at timmons.com>, "supras list"
>> <supras at supras.com>
>>Message-ID: <04ad01c6e652$fbce35e0$cb996844 at nyzzle>
>>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>>
>>Correct, the MK3 didn't get PPS steering until the 1989 model year. The
>>hoses are different between an '89 WITH PPS and one WITHOUT PPS. Your
>>'88s
>>power steering rack is different from the '89+ setup. Regardless of being
>>equipped with PPS or not. With the subframes being different, I'm not
>>sure
>>the '89 non-PPS rack would fit in the '88 subframe. If you're only
>>replacing the hoses, make sure to order the hoses to match the production
>>year of your Supra. This will make for an easy and straight-forward
>>replacement!
>>
>>HTH,
>>
>>Dave 92T & 84 P-type
>>Mesa, AZ
>>www.azsupras.com/suprattop.htm
>>www.azsupras.com
>>
>>
>>----- Original Message -----
>>From: Brian Walker
>>To: supras list
>>Sent: Monday, October 02, 2006 11:13 AM
>>Subject: [Supras] Progressive PPS years??
>>
>>
>>I was looking up the P/N's for lines of the PS system (Thanks Mike for
>>the EPC being updated) and the P/N for the PS pressure hose lists
>>several variations. On listing is for 89-92 w/ progressive steering. Is
>>this something the 86-88 did not include? I had always assumed it did
>>but have never had to mess with the PS system (was planning to replacing
>>the old lines)
>>
>>Thanks,
>>
>>Brian W-88T
>>
>>
>>------------------------------
>>
>>Message: 3
>>Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 14:59:59 -0400
>>From: "Brian Walker" <Brian.Walker at timmons.com>
>>Subject: Re: [Supras] Progressive PPS years??
>>To: "Dave Koos" <dave at azsupras.com>, "supras list" <supras at supras.com>
>>Message-ID:
>> <7FC96997A9B03C46BDCCC4A071D16AF603BE8D47 at webmail.timmons.com>
>>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>>
>>Thanks very much for pointing this out Dave, if this is the case, I
>>could swap the rack from my 89 parts car under Scca rules but what are
>>the opinions on the system? It seems like the car would have better
>>turn-in, just a matter of getting used to the difference. Do you know if
>>the lower speed ratio the same as the non-PPS setup?
>>
>>
>>
>>Thanks,
>>
>>Brian W
>>
>>
>>
>> _____
>>
>>From: Dave Koos [mailto:dave at azsupras.com]
>>Sent: Monday, October 02, 2006 2:46 PM
>>To: Brian Walker; supras list
>>Subject: Re: [Supras] Progressive PPS years??
>>
>>
>>
>>Correct, the MK3 didn't get PPS steering until the 1989 model year. The
>>hoses are different between an '89 WITH PPS and one WITHOUT PPS. Your
>>'88s power steering rack is different from the '89+ setup. Regardless
>>of being equipped with PPS or not. With the subframes being different,
>>I'm not sure the '89 non-PPS rack would fit in the '88 subframe. If
>>you're only replacing the hoses, make sure to order the hoses to match
>>the production year of your Supra. This will make for an easy and
>>straight-forward replacement!
>>
>>
>>
>>HTH,
>>
>>
>>Dave 92T & 84 P-type
>>Mesa, AZ
>>www.azsupras.com/suprattop.htm <http://www.azsupras.com/suprattop.htm>
>>www.azsupras.com <http://www.azsupras.com>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>----- Original Message -----
>>
>>From: Brian Walker <mailto:Brian.Walker at timmons.com>
>>
>>To: supras list <mailto:supras at supras.com>
>>
>>Sent: Monday, October 02, 2006 11:13 AM
>>
>>Subject: [Supras] Progressive PPS years??
>>
>>
>>
>>I was looking up the P/N's for lines of the PS system (Thanks Mike for
>>the EPC being updated) and the P/N for the PS pressure hose lists
>>several variations. On listing is for 89-92 w/ progressive steering. Is
>>this something the 86-88 did not include? I had always assumed it did
>>but have never had to mess with the PS system (was planning to replacing
>>the old lines)
>>
>>Thanks,
>>
>>Brian W-88T
>>
>>
>>
>>------------------------------
>>
>>Message: 4
>>Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2006 19:50:05 -0400
>>From: Jeff <jprisco at optonline.net>
>>Subject: [Supras] Power stearing pump
>>To: Supras at supras.com
>>Message-ID: <05d101c6e67d$7c49ce30$0d29f2c6 at homeepc>
>>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>>
>>I've had a number of power steering problems over the last 8 months -
>>rebuilt the rack and replaced all of the hoses - cleaned out the screen in
>>the reservoir while changing the hoses. Problem now is that when the car
>>warms (10 minutes) the PS gets really loud and there isn't as much assist
>>as I would expect. Could it be the fluid? Is there one type that's better
>>then the other or one that's best for "challenged" pumps?
>>
>>TIA
>>
>>91 Turbo
>>
>>Jeff
>>-------------- next part --------------
>>No virus found in this outgoing message.
>>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>>Version: 7.1.407 / Virus Database: 268.12.11/460 - Release Date: 10/1/2006
>>
>>------------------------------
>>
>>Message: 5
>>Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2006 21:45:05 -0500
>>From: Jim Thomann <list1 at thomann.no-ip.com>
>>Subject: Re: [Supras] needing parts to go turbo
>>To: Sean Cavanaugh <Millenia2000 at hotmail.com>
>>Cc: supras at supras.com
>>Message-ID: <4521CEB1.70908 at thomann.no-ip.com>
>>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>>
>>Aren't the differences between the Turbo and NA blocks the pistons and
>>oil squirters?
>>
>>I haven't seen either first hand yet, but soon. The engine is out and
>>the head is ready to come off.
>>
>>JimT
>>
>>Sean Cavanaugh wrote:
>> > my N/A block already blew up so i already got a turbo block in there.
>> > it
>> > just has N/A externals. and i got a turbo tranny for it already (one
>>that
>> > was in car with the turbo. the turbo block is better to use due to the
>>lower
>> > compression ratio, the oil injectors, the oil passages for turbo oil
>>flow.
>> > Can you turbo the N/A block? yes but it takes more work to make it
>>stable
>> > but it CAN be done.
>> >
>> > -Sean
>> >
>> >
>> > ----- Original Message -----
>> > From: "supraman88" <supraman88 at verizon.net>
>> > To: "Sean Cavanaugh" <millenia2000 at hotmail.com>; <supras at supras.com>
>> > Sent: Monday, October 02, 2006 8:18 AM
>> > Subject: Re: [Supras] needing parts to go turbo
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >> Maybe someone can set me straight here, but I have seen it in a number
>>of
>> >> places (and from the Techs when I used to work at a Toyota dealer)
>> >> that
>>it
>> >> is not a good idea to put a turbo on an NA supra. This appears to be
>>for a
>> >> number of reasons, one being that the NA engine isn't as robust as the
>> >> Turbo
>> >> version, and that the transmission (for the 5 speed model) doesn't
>> >> have
>> >> the
>> >> headroom required. The W58 trans is rated at 240 HP, with the NA
>>version
>> >> engine rated at 200. That is why the factory Turbo has a beefier
>> >> transmission.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> ----- Original Message -----
>> >> From: "Sean Cavanaugh" <millenia2000 at hotmail.com>
>> >> To: <supras at supras.com>
>> >> Sent: Friday, September 29, 2006 12:14 PM
>> >> Subject: [Supras] needing parts to go turbo
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>> I'm slowly getting the pieces i need to get my car converted to
>> >>> turbo.
>> >>> kinda hard when im strapped for cash
>> >>>
>> >>> still need:
>> >>> - Intercooler
>> >>> - IC piping (gonna just use PVC)
>> >>> - Downpipe
>> >>> - cat (already taged where to get)
>> >>> - cat back exhaust.
>> >>>
>> >>> i'm just looking at getting parts to make it work. I'll worry about
>> >>> getting parts that make it work better later.
>> >>>
>> >>> this will take me a while cuz im going standalone with the MS first,
>>then
>> >>> switching over to turbo intake manifold , 440 injectors, and
>> >>> coilpacks
>> >>> then the actual turbo setup.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> -Sean
>> >>>
>>
>>
>>
>>------------------------------
>>
>>Message: 6
>>Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 20:33:51 -0700
>>From: "Jeff Mohler" <speedtoys.racing at gmail.com>
>>Subject: Re: [Supras] needing parts to go turbo
>>To: "Jim Thomann" <list1 at thomann.no-ip.com>
>>Cc: supras at supras.com
>>Message-ID:
>> <a969fbd10610022033i149d7c36k20fe936cfdc5e78b at mail.gmail.com>
>>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
>>
>>And no oil feed or drain for the turbo...and no drilled holes (much
>>less tapped) for the knock sensors.
>>
>>Knock sensor solution is simple, oil feed/drain is simple for someone
>>who knows their way around a machine shop. No squirters isnt an issue
>>for 99% of the list.
>>
>>On 10/2/06, Jim Thomann <list1 at thomann.no-ip.com> wrote:
>> > Aren't the differences between the Turbo and NA blocks the pistons and
>> > oil squirters?
>> >
>> > I haven't seen either first hand yet, but soon. The engine is out and
>> > the head is ready to come off.
>> >
>> > JimT
>> >
>> > Sean Cavanaugh wrote:
>> > > my N/A block already blew up so i already got a turbo block in there.
>>it
>> > > just has N/A externals. and i got a turbo tranny for it already (one
>>that
>> > > was in car with the turbo. the turbo block is better to use due to
>> > > the
>>lower
>> > > compression ratio, the oil injectors, the oil passages for turbo oil
>>flow.
>> > > Can you turbo the N/A block? yes but it takes more work to make it
>>stable
>> > > but it CAN be done.
>> > >
>> > > -Sean
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > ----- Original Message -----
>> > > From: "supraman88" <supraman88 at verizon.net>
>> > > To: "Sean Cavanaugh" <millenia2000 at hotmail.com>; <supras at supras.com>
>> > > Sent: Monday, October 02, 2006 8:18 AM
>> > > Subject: Re: [Supras] needing parts to go turbo
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >> Maybe someone can set me straight here, but I have seen it in a
>>number of
>> > >> places (and from the Techs when I used to work at a Toyota dealer)
>>that it
>> > >> is not a good idea to put a turbo on an NA supra. This appears to be
>>for a
>> > >> number of reasons, one being that the NA engine isn't as robust as
>>the
>> > >> Turbo
>> > >> version, and that the transmission (for the 5 speed model) doesn't
>>have
>> > >> the
>> > >> headroom required. The W58 trans is rated at 240 HP, with the NA
>>version
>> > >> engine rated at 200. That is why the factory Turbo has a beefier
>> > >> transmission.
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> ----- Original Message -----
>> > >> From: "Sean Cavanaugh" <millenia2000 at hotmail.com>
>> > >> To: <supras at supras.com>
>> > >> Sent: Friday, September 29, 2006 12:14 PM
>> > >> Subject: [Supras] needing parts to go turbo
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>> I'm slowly getting the pieces i need to get my car converted to
>>turbo.
>> > >>> kinda hard when im strapped for cash
>> > >>>
>> > >>> still need:
>> > >>> - Intercooler
>> > >>> - IC piping (gonna just use PVC)
>> > >>> - Downpipe
>> > >>> - cat (already taged where to get)
>> > >>> - cat back exhaust.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> i'm just looking at getting parts to make it work. I'll worry about
>> > >>> getting parts that make it work better later.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> this will take me a while cuz im going standalone with the MS
>> > >>> first,
>>then
>> > >>> switching over to turbo intake manifold , 440 injectors, and
>>coilpacks
>> > >>> then the actual turbo setup.
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>> -Sean
>> > >>>
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Supras mailing list
>> > Supras at supras.com
>> > http://supras.com/mailman/listinfo/supras_supras.com
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>>------------------------------
>>
>>Message: 7
>>Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2006 16:39:32 +1300
>>From: "suprra girl" <suprra at gmail.com>
>>Subject: [Supras] cygnusx1 tsrm
>>To: Supras at supras.com
>>Message-ID:
>> <fe2963440610022039o7db92b44ue72828a433a0da5d at mail.gmail.com>
>>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>>
>>hey :)
>>
>>just thought i'd point out that under EFI for the 02 sensors they're a bit
>>arse about face hehe
>>
>>oxygen sensor = egr gas temp sensor
>>sub oxygen sensor = oxygen sensor
>>
>>just thought i'd let ya know :)
>>
>>--
>>Cheers
>>
>>Suze
>>7M POWAH! ;)
>>www.supra.co.nz
>>
>>
>>------------------------------
>>
>>Message: 8
>>Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 21:35:25 -0700
>>From: "Dave Koos" <dave at azsupras.com>
>>Subject: Re: [Supras] Power stearing pump
>>To: "Jeff" <jprisco at optonline.net>, <Supras at supras.com>
>>Message-ID: <051401c6e6a5$58a68c20$cb996844 at nyzzle>
>>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>>
>>What pump are you running?! Aftermarket pumps absolutely SUCK!! Your
>>best
>>bet is to buy a re-seal kit for the factory pump and rebuild it yourself.
>>The aftermarket racks seem to be ok. I've ran one in my MK2 for the last
>>2+ years without issue (knock on wood)!!
>>
>>I bet it's your pump that's causing the issues.
>>
>>HTH,
>>
>>Dave 92T & 84 P-type
>>Mesa, AZ
>>www.azsupras.com/suprattop.htm
>>www.azsupras.com
>>
>>
>>----- Original Message -----
>>From: Jeff
>>To: Supras at supras.com
>>Sent: Monday, October 02, 2006 4:50 PM
>>Subject: [Supras] Power stearing pump
>>
>>
>>I've had a number of power steering problems over the last 8 months -
>>rebuilt the rack and replaced all of the hoses - cleaned out the screen in
>>the reservoir while changing the hoses. Problem now is that when the car
>>warms (10 minutes) the PS gets really loud and there isn't as much assist
>>as I would expect. Could it be the fluid? Is there one type that's better
>>then the other or one that's best for "challenged" pumps?
>>
>>TIA
>>
>>91 Turbo
>>
>>Jeff
>>
>>------------------------------
>>
>>Message: 9
>>Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 21:39:19 -0700
>>From: "Dave Koos" <dave at azsupras.com>
>>Subject: Re: [Supras] Progressive PPS years??
>>To: "Brian Walker" <Brian.Walker at timmons.com>, "supras list"
>> <supras at supras.com>
>>Message-ID: <051e01c6e6a5$e437eae0$cb996844 at nyzzle>
>>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>>
>>I have no idea how the '89+ non-PPS rack would feel in an '88 chassis.
>>Not
>>sure what else (if anything) you'd have to change over to make it work.
>>The pumps should be the same as is the low pressure line. If your '89
>>DOES
>>have PPS, then you won't have it in the '88 chassis as the electrical
>>solenoid plugs into the engine wiring harness!!! I seriously doubt the
>>'88
>>wiring harness has the necessary wires to plug it in!!
>>
>>Good luck!
>>
>>Dave 92T & 84 P-type
>>Mesa, AZ
>>www.azsupras.com/suprattop.htm
>>www.azsupras.com
>>
>>
>>----- Original Message -----
>>From: Brian Walker
>>To: Dave Koos ; supras list
>>Sent: Monday, October 02, 2006 11:59 AM
>>Subject: RE: [Supras] Progressive PPS years??
>>
>>
>>Thanks very much for pointing this out Dave, if this is the case, I could
>>swap the rack from my 89 parts car under Scca rules but what are the
>>opinions on the system? It seems like the car would have better turn-in,
>>just a matter of getting used to the difference. Do you know if the lower
>>speed ratio the same as the non-PPS setup?
>>
>>
>>
>>Thanks,
>>
>>Brian W
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>From: Dave Koos [mailto:dave at azsupras.com]
>>Sent: Monday, October 02, 2006 2:46 PM
>>To: Brian Walker; supras list
>>Subject: Re: [Supras] Progressive PPS years??
>>
>>
>>
>>Correct, the MK3 didn't get PPS steering until the 1989 model year. The
>>hoses are different between an '89 WITH PPS and one WITHOUT PPS. Your
>>'88s
>>power steering rack is different from the '89+ setup. Regardless of being
>>equipped with PPS or not. With the subframes being different, I'm not
>>sure
>>the '89 non-PPS rack would fit in the '88 subframe. If you're only
>>replacing the hoses, make sure to order the hoses to match the production
>>year of your Supra. This will make for an easy and straight-forward
>>replacement!
>>
>>
>>
>>HTH,
>>
>>
>>Dave 92T & 84 P-type
>>Mesa, AZ
>>www.azsupras.com/suprattop.htm
>>www.azsupras.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>----- Original Message -----
>>
>>From: Brian Walker
>>
>>To: supras list
>>
>>Sent: Monday, October 02, 2006 11:13 AM
>>
>>Subject: [Supras] Progressive PPS years??
>>
>>
>>
>>I was looking up the P/N's for lines of the PS system (Thanks Mike for
>>the EPC being updated) and the P/N for the PS pressure hose lists
>>several variations. On listing is for 89-92 w/ progressive steering. Is
>>this something the 86-88 did not include? I had always assumed it did
>>but have never had to mess with the PS system (was planning to replacing
>>the old lines)
>>
>>Thanks,
>>
>>Brian W-88T
>>
>>
>>------------------------------
>>
>>Message: 10
>>Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2006 05:19:39 -0700 (PDT)
>>From: Rockey Fox <supr91tt at yahoo.com>
>>Subject: Re: [Supras] Progressive PPS years??
>>To: Dave Koos <dave at azsupras.com>, Brian Walker
>> <Brian.Walker at timmons.com>, supras list <supras at supras.com>
>>Message-ID: <20061003121939.33741.qmail at web51601.mail.yahoo.com>
>>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
>>
>>I'm not sure which year it started but there is an
>>expensive "idle up" valve on the rear of my 91T power
>>steering pump that has a vacuum line running through
>>it. As that valve was too expensive to replace when it
>>busted i've tried without success blocking up the hole
>>but the pressure must be higher than my hydraulic
>>sealer and a bolt will hold.
>>I'm considering going with an earlier model pump
>>without that particular goofy threaded hole in the
>>back plate so I'm also interested to know if the
>>earlier year model PS pump will work on the 91T.
>>
>>TIA,
>>Rockey 91T
>>
>>--- Dave Koos <dave at azsupras.com> wrote:
>>
>> > I have no idea how the '89+ non-PPS rack would feel
>> > in an '88 chassis. Not sure what else (if anything)
>> > you'd have to change over to make it work. The
>> > pumps should be the same as is the low pressure
>> > line. If your '89 DOES have PPS, then you won't
>> > have it in the '88 chassis as the electrical
>> > solenoid plugs into the engine wiring harness!!! I
>> > seriously doubt the '88 wiring harness has the
>> > necessary wires to plug it in!!
>> >
>> > Good luck!
>> >
>> > Dave 92T & 84 P-type
>> > Mesa, AZ
>> > www.azsupras.com/suprattop.htm
>> > www.azsupras.com
>> >
>> >
>> > ----- Original Message -----
>> > From: Brian Walker
>> > To: Dave Koos ; supras list
>> > Sent: Monday, October 02, 2006 11:59 AM
>> > Subject: RE: [Supras] Progressive PPS years??
>> >
>> >
>> > Thanks very much for pointing this out Dave, if this
>> > is the case, I could swap the rack from my 89 parts
>> > car under Scca rules but what are the opinions on
>> > the system? It seems like the car would have better
>> > turn-in, just a matter of getting used to the
>> > difference. Do you know if the lower speed ratio the
>> > same as the non-PPS setup?
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> >
>> > Brian W
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >
>> > From: Dave Koos [mailto:dave at azsupras.com]
>> > Sent: Monday, October 02, 2006 2:46 PM
>> > To: Brian Walker; supras list
>> > Subject: Re: [Supras] Progressive PPS years??
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Correct, the MK3 didn't get PPS steering until the
>> > 1989 model year. The hoses are different between an
>> > '89 WITH PPS and one WITHOUT PPS. Your '88s power
>> > steering rack is different from the '89+ setup.
>> > Regardless of being equipped with PPS or not. With
>> > the subframes being different, I'm not sure the '89
>> > non-PPS rack would fit in the '88 subframe. If
>> > you're only replacing the hoses, make sure to order
>> > the hoses to match the production year of your
>> > Supra. This will make for an easy and
>> > straight-forward replacement!
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > HTH,
>> >
>> >
>> > Dave 92T & 84 P-type
>> > Mesa, AZ
>> > www.azsupras.com/suprattop.htm
>> > www.azsupras.com
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > ----- Original Message -----
>> >
>> > From: Brian Walker
>> >
>> > To: supras list
>> >
>> > Sent: Monday, October 02, 2006 11:13 AM
>> >
>> > Subject: [Supras] Progressive PPS years??
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > I was looking up the P/N's for lines of the PS
>> > system (Thanks Mike for
>> > the EPC being updated) and the P/N for the PS
>> > pressure hose lists
>> > several variations. On listing is for 89-92 w/
>> > progressive steering. Is
>> > this something the 86-88 did not include? I had
>> > always assumed it did
>> > but have never had to mess with the PS system (was
>> > planning to replacing
>> > the old lines)
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> >
>> > Brian W-88T
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Supras mailing list
>> > Supras at supras.com
>> > http://supras.com/mailman/listinfo/supras_supras.com
>> >
>>
>>
>>__________________________________________________
>>Do You Yahoo!?
>>Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
>>http://mail.yahoo.com
>>
>>
>>
>>------------------------------
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Supras mailing list
>>Supras at supras.com
>>http://supras.com/mailman/listinfo/supras_supras.com
>>
>>
>>End of Supras Digest, Vol 35, Issue 2
>>*************************************
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Supras mailing list
> Supras at supras.com
> http://supras.com/mailman/listinfo/supras_supras.com
More information about the Supras
mailing list