[Supras] (no subject)
Dm19959 at aol.com
Dm19959 at aol.com
Sat Jun 3 22:03:59 CDT 2006
This will be my only response to your drivel as this type of banter serves
no useful purpose to the list and I have already blocked your email address.
In a message dated 6/3/2006 7:34:15 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
aaron.picker at gmail.com writes:
> LOL, you are ignorant aren't you? You have NOT been replying to the list,
only to me individually.
Thanks for catching my mistake.
I am sorry that I pointed that out to you as now you see fit in bringing
this to the list.
> Your comment "Ninety-five of cars ever built do not come with factory
and/or engineering defects" is incredibly humorous and once
> again illustrates your lack of a grasp on reality.
I take this to mean that you believe that 95% of cars built actually do come
with factory and/or engineering defects. If this is correct, I respectfully
disagree.
Yes, that is correct. There are engineering defects in 95%+ of the cars
built. Be it the shape of the climate control knobs or something worse.
> If you maintained your MKII or MKIII the way you construct emails and
respond to emails then it is obscenely obvious why you had so
> many problems.
I never had any problems at all with the mk2. It had no design flaws and
ran well. On the mk3, the head gasket issue is a known fact. You suggested
that people shouldn't "buy in" to the head gasket problem. Toyota themselves
did "buy in" to it, there was a service bulletin issued.
Your previous responses regarding the MKIII head gasket issue make it seem
as if it is something that can not be repaired. However, it can through proper
machining of the head and block surfaces and increased torque value on the
fasteners.. Also, you state that the MKIII's aluminum head and cast iron block
is the reason for the many "unsolvable" problems. This has been addressed
numerous times.
> I can go on as well but I choose not to as you are simply a bi-polar waste
of time.
You're the waste of time, you are trying to claim that every car ever made
has major problems that require a revision of the factory specs.
No, I stated that I feel that 95%+ of the cars built have engineering flaws.
Not that they have "major problems" unless you consider a cup holder that is
too small for "Big Gulps" a "major problem".
> Have a nice day.
Morons like you make my days amusing.
> LOL
Are you laughing at yourself? You are trying to claim in front of the
entire list that every car on the road has major problems.
No, once again you are incorrect.
Ta-ta for now.
Permanently for those capable of blocking email addresses such as yours.
More information about the Supras
mailing list